logo

CLT homeownership vs.renting and non CLT ownership?
CLT homeownership provides families stability and security not found with renting. CLT homeowners have control of their housing. CLT homeowners benefit from stable monthly housing payments, security from eviction, and the opportunity to build equity. CLT homeowners can also take advantage of income tax deductions for their property taxes and the interest paid on their mortgage.

clt-rental comparison

Community Land Trust Ownership
A community land trust achieves permanently affordable homeownership opportunities for low to moderate-income households by separating the ownership of the house and the land. A community land trust achieves permanent, long-term housing affordability through the use of a Ground Lease. CLT homebuyers purchase only the house, and enter into a 99-year Ground Lease with the community land trust for the exclusive use of the land. When a CLT homeowner decides to sell their home, the house is sold to another low-to-moderate income household for the original purchase price plus 25% of any appreciation in the home’s value. By limiting market appreciation, permanent affordability is ensured and initial subsidies invested in making the home affordable for future generations of low-to-moderate income homebuyers.

<< Back to Top >>

Conventional Resident Ownership
In this model, the housing sponsor transfers to the resident "full" (fee simple) ownership of the entire property. Limitations are established through either a deed restriction, a collateral agreement, or a mortgage agreement. The model works well for a program that simply wants to recapture a subsidy, In that case, the sponsor can simply use a mortgage to secure the amount of subsidy to be repaid upon resale. The conventional resident-ownership model can also be used with resale price restrictions. In order to transfer full title to the resident and then restrict resale, the sponsor will need to use a deed restriction or collateral agreement. Because of the statutory time limits on deed restrictions and the property law limits on perpetual restrictions in either deeds or collateral agreements, any resale price restrictions in connection with conventional resident-ownership will probably have to be limited to a certain time period rather than establishing permanent affordability.

<< Back to Top >>

Condominium Ownership
Condominium ownership in multi-family buildings is roughly the equivalent of conventional resident-ownership in single-family homes. The individual owner has fee simple ownership of the unit as defined by the walls, ceilings, and floors. All the unit owners together own the common areas through a condominium association. While condominium ownership was not originally conceived as an affordable housing model, housing organizations have recently begun to set up limited-equity condominiums. Limitations on the residents' equity are implemented in much the same way as with conventional resident-ownership - through deed restrictions or collateral agreements containing preemptive options, or through mortgages allowing subsidy recapture. Because the model is similar to conventional single-family resident-ownership, the same questions as to the enforceability of long-term resale restrictions apply. The condominium association or housing sponsor may have a stronger justification for an over-all affordable housing scheme for the whole building. Nonetheless, legal concerns about long-term enforceability have led sponsors either to draft restrictions that preserve affordability only for a limited period of time, or to arrange for ownership of the land by a community land trust, with long-term affordability protected by provisions in the land trust ground lease.

<< Back to Top >>

Cooperative Ownership
With the cooperative ownership model, title to the property is placed in corporation rather than being divided among the individual residents. The residents purchase shares of stock in the corporation and participate in governing the corporation as owners. As a shareholder, the resident received a long-term ("proprietary") lease to her housing unit. In limited-equity cooperatives, the bylaws require that each resident agree to a restriction on the price that she can receive when she sells her share of stock. Perpetual resale restrictions on shares of stock do not involve the problems of legal enforceability that accompany restrictions on the resale of conventional resident-owned or condominium homes. The rules against restraints and perpetuities apply primarily to interests in real property. A resident's ownership of stock in a cooperative typically is considered to be an interest in personal rather than real property. However, while the long-term enforceability of the restrictions may not be a problem, the long-term existence of the restrictions themselves may be jeopardized. As noted above, the restrictions are implemented through the cooperative's bylaws, which can be revised by the resident-shareholders, who may have a strong interest in removing resale restrictions. Cooperative ownership is therefore a less than perfect means of preserving long-term affordability, unless the continued existence of resale restrictions can be assured by means not inherent in the model itself. One way of ensuring the continued existence of a cooperative's resale restrictions is to arrange for ownership of the land by a community land trust. Land trusts themselves are often the developer/sponsors of limited-equity cooperatives of their land. In these cases, the land trust ground lease requires that specified resale restrictions remain in place perpetually. The land trust monitors the ground lease agreement with the cooperative and can enforce its terms when necessary.

<< Back to Top >>

 

 

 


<< Back to Top >>

contact information

logo